Recent Posts

Gender

Short on the 10th

by Dog Gone on May 23, 2013

Closely associated with right-wing-nuttery are the so-called ‘tenthers’, those who support an oddly unconstitutional view of the 10th amendment relating to states rights.  For those of you not familiar with the various ‘flavors’ of right wing think, here is a handy summation from Wikipedia on the topic which saves me hurting my brain trying to sum it up:

 

The Tenther movement is a political ideology and a social movement in the United States that espouses that many actions of the United States government are unconstitutional.[1] Adherents invoke the concept that the states share sovereignty with the federal government and with the people by citing the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution as the basis for their legal and ideological beliefs:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Adherents believe that political authority enumerated in the United States Constitution as belonging to the Federal Government must be read very narrowly to exclude much of what the national government already does.[2] They argue for the recognition of limited sovereignty of the States.[3] Opponents use the term in order to draw parallels between adherents and 19th century states’ rightssecessionists, as well as the movement to resist Federal Civil Rights legislation.[4]Adherents oppose a broad range of federal government programs, including the War on Drugs, federal surveillance, and other limitations on privacy and civil and economic liberties, plus numerous New Deal legislation to Great Society legislation, such as Medicaid, Medicare, the VA health system and the G.I. Bill.[2]

 

, it has been argued by tenthers that the 2003 Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas, which invalidated sodomy laws in all U.S. states where they remained, was an unconstitutional federal intrusion into what should have been a states’ rights area; from the tenther perspective, “there clearly is no right to sodomy found anywhere in the Constitution” and “the State of Texas has the right to decide for itself how to regulate social matters like sex, using its own local standards”.

 

In Congress this past week, Vermont Senator Leahy had introduced legislation to the Immigration reform under discussion which would allow couples in states which recognize same-sex marriage to apply for same-sex spouse green cards.  Twelve states, like Minnesota, like 11 other states, already recognize same-sex marriage, and a number of other states, notably Illinois and Michigan are in the process of recognizing it.

 

What other right wing senators, like Lindsey Graham, did was to pressure Senator Leahy to withdraw his amendment to the legislation, indicating that inclusion of full and equal recognition of same sex marriage at the state level was a ‘deal breaker’. It’s toss up where the greatest concentration of tenthers reside – South Carolina or Texas; Loopy Lindsey has been an outspoken tenther on more than one occasion; his selective amnesia is an indictment to his sincerity.

 

This is ironic, given that it is precisely these same bigoted homophobes who tend to be the loudest and most strident supporters of states rights.  It shows the right up for the rabid hypocrites and bigots that they are, for supporting states rights to define marriage, and then denying the states the right to define marriage when they don’t happen to like the definition of some states.

 

It’s time to repeal DOMA. It is past time for the SCOTUS to overturn federal laws that do not recognize same-sex marriage, NOT because of the tenth amendment, but because that is unfair federal discrimination.

 

While I appreciate WHY Leahy removed his amendment from consideration, it’s time to stand up to right wing bigotry and homophobia, and it is time to call out conservative hypocrisy.  That needs to be true at the local, state, AND federal level.  Minnesotans fought hard for marriage equality, because this move is an attempt to negate what Minnesotans have fought for so very hard this year.  It is wrong for Lindsey Graham and others to try to deny us what they claim they wanted, so long as state definition of marriage went their way.  Either states define marriage, or they don’t; they can’t have it both ways; but they will try if we don’t push back, hard.

 

 

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 0 comments }

220px-Betty_McCollum_Official_Photo_2009From Tuesday:
 

U.S. Rep. Betty McCollum today introduced legislation to establish a special U.S. House committee to conduct oversight, ensure accountability, and report on sexual assault and abuse in the U.S. military. Responding to the on-going and ever growing problem of sexual violence and abuse committed by members of the military, the “Special Committee on Sexual Assault and Abuse in the Armed Forces” would focus congressional attention on necessary reforms to the Department of Defense’s prevention, prosecution, and victims’ services efforts.

And it just so happens that Minnesota’s Congressman most identified with the military is avoiding this issue as determinedly as if it’s an opponent that wants to debate him in public.
 

And from Minnesota’s Member that is assigned to the Armed Services Committee …. John Kline (R-MN-02) … silence.
No outrage.
No press release.
No Facebook post.
No Tweet.
No membership in the bi-partisan Military Sexual Assault Prevention Caucus
And No Legislation … heck, John Kline has failed to co-sponsor the BE-SAFE Act (H.R. 1867), the Military Judicial Reform Act of 2013 (H.R. 1079) or Sexual Assault Training Oversight and Prevention Act (H.R. 1593) — all legislation that has bi-partisan support and addresses sexual assaults in the military.
Simply stated, John Kline continues to disappoint Minnesotans.
 
(MN Political Roundtable)

I’m not qualified to provide informed, comprehensive discussion on sexual assault in the military, which is being described with terms like “epidemic.” For example, as to whether it‘s more about a redneck conservative military culture, or the proverbial “few bad apples.” (Though I have my opinions, and they lean strongly toward the former.) The bottom line is that it has to end, and legislators that don’t help to seriously work toward that, via their votes, don’t belong in office.
 

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 1 comment }

Mother Jones wrote a great piece, “A Political history of the Cicadas” on the pending cycle of Cicadas, the annoying, noisy but harmless little bugs that have an unusual 17 year life cycle.  Some people mistakenly confuse them with the destructive plagues of locusts, which can do devastating damage; they’re nothing like that, except for also occurring in  large numbers.

 

What caught my attention mid-way through the piece were these two paragraphs:

…”The government experts assure us that the cicada is not as dangerous or as devastating as he sounds,” a Gazette Times story from July 1923—titled “The Periodical Cicada, Naturalists Alarmed”—read. In the 1930s, government experts also reassured concerned citizens regarding cicada “locusts.” Even in the Reagan era, the government issued an official public pamphlet on the subject of cicadas. The government’s care-free attitude persists today: “The Obama administration currently has no plan to suppress the ‘cicada invasion,’” an administration official tells me. (Partly because, as off-putting as they sound and appear, cicadas are good for plants and the affected environment.)

In 2004, the harmlessness and notoriety of the cicada prompted Brandon Breeden, head writer of the website Cicadaville.com, to spread satirical rumors about how cicadas are “vicious killers seething with deadly venom,” and how “children are [cicadas'] primary source of nutrition.” As a result, Breeden received emails thanking him “for the truth about cicadas the government’s been keeping secret.”

(Cicadaville.com has since been converted into a Japanese website about STDs.)

 

It is both tragic and hysterically funny that there are conspiracy theorists, then and now, that believe the government is hiding from the public necessary information about great swarms of insects coming to take away your children. (Presumably this would be a variation on the scarab beetles in the turn of the century Brendan Fraser Mummy movie sci-fi fantasies.)  The only thing lacking is a companion conspiracy that either 1. you need guns to defend yourself and your family against the swarms of locusts; 2. the locusts are an Obama administration conspiracy to come take your guns/ render your guns useless; or 3. the locusts will turn your children into mindless zombies, who will be turned over to New World Order FEMA camps, (with the smarter ones being shipped off to the bug-proof frozen fortresses of the Illuminati).

 

I’m just going to sit back and laugh at the crazy conspiracy nuts on the right, and maybe cruise by the food channel to see if anyone is showing off how to cook the little buggers, er, bugs, in some exotic healthy snack they’re good for you kind of way.  I don’t want to eat cicadas myself, no matter how they might be batter deep fried or covered in chocolate on a stick. But it’s fun to watch other people besides conservatives running around with their hair on fire – but secretly enjoying their own emotions while they do it.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 4 comments }

As part of the opposition to same sex marriage equality propaganda sent by email, they make some claims that range the gamut from clearly untrue to outright bull**** lies, of the whopper size and type.

 

From April 26th, Minnesota for Marriage  email:

Poll after poll since the election has shown that Minnesotans do NOT want marriage redefined, and many of you in Greater Minnesota proved it at Stand for Marriage rallies!

 

Well………..NO, poll after poll since the 2012 election has shown  no such thing; but then they don’t dare quote specifics. It is true that SOME people have turned out to support traditional marriage, but those have not for the most part been substantial.  As many or more people have turned out in support of same sex marriage equality.  Poll after poll, nationwide and Minnesota specific have shown the opposite.

 

Noting from the New York Times and PollingReport.com, as of March 26th, 2013:

 

And the gap has been steadily widening in favor of same sex marriage since 1996, so this isn’t a recent change in direction of public opinion polls. Is it a lie when it is told by religious organizations – or can they just absolve themselves, making it acceptable to the religious right?

 

The attempt to change the state constitution to prevent same sex marriage as an  legislative option in 2012, a move  that backfired as an attempt to create a wedge issue to benefit the MN GOP, at the state’s expense.  A case could be made that it resulted instead in the larger turnout for the other side — and the majority of the legislature for the Democrats. …READ MORE

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 0 comments }

It’s the Autonomy, stupid!

by Dog Gone on March 18, 2013

During the Clinton campaign for President against incumbent George H. W. Bush, he used the campaign slogan created by James Carville, “It’s the economy, stupid.”
 
We are in great need of a revival of that phrase, with a revision to “It’s the autonomy, stupid” to push back against the attempts by the right wing to impose their authority over the bodies and the behavior of women.
 

This weekend the verdict came in against the two defendants in Steubenville Ohio, for the crime of raping a young woman and posting the details all over social media.  Their defense? She didn’t say no (because of being unconscious), so it wasn’t rape, and that she consented because she drank alcohol.  The ‘poor rapists’ were actually given far too much positive spin by mainstream media, while the victim was blamed for her own rape, because of drinking.
 
In the preceding week, Reuters reported that one of the Cardinals who participated in the election of the new pope claims that pedophilia is not a crime, that it is an illness. Really? For the victim it is certainly a crime.  It is not an excuse for any criminal conduct because of a mental health issue if the person committing the crime is capable of knowing what they are doing, and able to discern right from wrong. This is an attempt to provide more sympathy and justification for hiding the crimes of predatory clergy, while NOT facing up to the criminal aspects of the sex predators or the harm done to the many, many victims.
 

At the same time, as we saw from the 60 minutes interview on Sunday, “American Nuns struggle with the Vatican for change” in support of social justice, and much needed internal reform in the church, that the church hierarchy has no trouble sending a man to whip the nuns into conformity with church authority and to bring them to heel to be submissive, regardless of what their conscience tells them. Uppity nuns get censured and harshly corrected, but male sexual predators get sympathy and obstruction of justice to protect them? Can anyone think of a case where a Nun was the sexual predator? Me neither, but if they did, I’d bet the nun would be disciplined, probably kicked out of her order, not had excuses made for her.
 
And in the same week came the reports of pedophilia rings in the Baptist church, where the clergy obstructed the criminal justice system to protect the perpetrators, both the male  members of the congregation and the male clergy – but did not protect female members or children.  This was true both inside the borders of the United States, and in their missionary efforts.  As with the Roman Catholic church conservatives, the reasoning was that as God represents authority, and the church represents authority, and men as head of the family represents authority, so pretty much anything they do is excused.  Sexual molestation of children, incest, wife beating – ANYTHING is excused, if you are a man.  If you’re a woman, or a girl, or a child, too bad for you, and it’s mostly your fault for causing those poor good godly men to sin, and/or commit a crime. And under all circumstances, hide the crimes from law enforcement and prosecution – those men must be protected.
 
While there is some hand wringing over our ‘rape culture’, what is wrong with our culture is that we do not value women, we do not protect women and children from violence and sexual predators, we do not provide them support from a strong social support net. Most of all we do not have respect for the autonomy of women to control their own lives and bodies.
 
Instead we have slut shaming, we have women who are forced to undergo the violation of transvaginal ultrasound that is not medically required or useful. We have legislation mandating lying to women about their health in the name of respecting the morality and religious belief of doctors. (Can you imagine passing legislation denying men the right to insurance coverage for what are colloquially called boner pills, or passing legislation giving doctors the right to lie to men about their reproductive health – say their prostate or testicular health, or cutting funding for it? Hell No.)  We have the right wing obstruction to the passage of the Violence Against Women Act – because the religious right has been opposing it from its inception because they believe the solution to domestic violence is for women just to be more submissive, and to put up with having the crap beaten out of them or being killed, rather than break up a marriage by leaving it.  Never mind that all the evidence shows that doesn’t work, never mind how many women are killed, or injured or threatened every year by their intimate partners – including a large number of husbands. The important thing to them is what men want, the important thing they consistently support is male authority.
 
We have efforts to obstruct the raising of the minimum wage, even though the majority of those wage earners are women, and we have the efforts by conservatives to repeal laws against paying women less than men for the same work.  The justification? Men are the breadwinners, and their work is more important to them, so they should be paid more. Does THAT reflect a respect for the independence, the autonomy, the control over their bodies and lives by women? It is an attempt to keep women more dependent, more vulnerable, and more submissive.
 
We have the attempt to pass the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, which would have redefined rape to be limited to forcible rape, making statutory rape no longer rape, making giving a woman a drug to render her unconscious and then raping a woman no longer rape.  That legislation was co-sponsored by CD 6 Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, a ‘dominionist’ of long standing, who has actively and frequently asserted women should be submissive and subordinate to men. It was also co-sponsored by CD 2 Congressman John Kline, and by CD 7 representative Collin Peterson, the only democrat from Minnesota to join in support of this legislation.  We have 31 states which give rapists the right to exercise parental rights over a child resulting from a pregnancy that resulted from rape, and to prevent a woman from having an abortion through the exercise of their rights.
 
We need support for the autonomy of women, the right for women to control their lives, including their reproductive choices.  We allow no person to force or coerce another person to submit their bodies to save the life of another person against their will – EXCEPT in pregnancies.  We are allowing the conservative anti-abortion fanatics to do exactly that when they legislate against abortion — they force women to submit to a pregnancy for an entity that is not even a person.
 
Why are women expendable? Why do we value women LESS than men? Why do we force women to submit control of their bodies to the will of another person? How is this not a violation of their constitutional rights and their right to physical autonomy – the independence of their bodies and minds, and the exercise of their own choice and conscience? How can we expect boys and men to respect women as their equals when the most conservative members of our culture so clearly do not? Rape is a crime not of sex, but of dominance that uses sex to assert that dominance. At issue is dominance, and autonomy.
 
In setting up our state mechanism for an insurance exchange that is part of Obamacare, abortion coverage was cut out; apparently women are not allowed to exercise their reproductive autonomy as full and competent moral and ethical human beings in Minnesota; instead the immoral religious right is allowed to impose their beliefs on all of us. The conservative message is clear; women should be controlled, and female sexuality is evil.  Neither is true, and this should not be allowed to be how we implement Obamacare.

In the national rankings comparing countries with each other for how women fare in terms of health, and power and fairness, like elected office or education or equality of economic compensation, the United States does not rank well.  In the ranking of states, we compare better; Minnesota is 6th out of the 50, in part due to the number of women we have in elected office. But we still are not doing enough to promote full equality, full autonomy, full value of women as human beings.
 
We ended slavery for people of color in 1865; isn’t it time that we grant women full autonomy as a group? When we do, when we REALLY do that, when we end the subordination of women to men, then and only then will we have genuine equality — and an end to the rape culture in the United States, both direct rape, forcible and otherwise, and the less obvious indirect rape by conservative misogynist politics.
 

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 1 comment }

Rep. Glenn Gruenhagen (R-Glencoe) is making a strong move to become the leader of the Ignorance Caucus. Gruenhagen went full-on racist earlier this week when debating the Minnesota Health Insurance Exchange. He stated that setting up the Exchange will give poor black women money when they get pregnant.
 

 

Here’s a transcription of Gruenhagen’s comments (the raw video is embedded further below):

 

When a country undermines traditional marriage, it cannot print up enough money to take care of all the problems that happen in our society. And we need to look no further than our welfare program and the black family in this country. Prior to the Great Society programs of the ’60s, the out-of-wedlock birth [rate] among black families, was under 20 percent. Today, in the inner city, the out-of-wedlock birth for black families is over 80 percent. And one of the primary reasons for that is we have developed government programs that will pick up the tab for having children out of wedlock.
 
The result is we exploit our women, we create a bad situation for our children — especially minorities — and we tell men that they can impregnate as many women as they want and the government will pick up the tab. I think we need to stop that philosophy, not expand it, with the credit and the Health Insurance Exchange.

 

Those preposterous remarks prompted a quick and pointed reply from Rep. Tina Liebling, D-Rochester. Here’s what she said:
 

I think we’re pretty far afield here from the bill and even from the amendment, with some of the comments that have been made. But I just think it’s really important to correct the record in one respect. First of all, in Minnesota right now, when people are in our Minnesota Family Investment Program — what a lot of people like to call welfare — and they have an additional child, they don’t get any more money. They don’t get any more money. And what they do get is very, very low.
 
So we have a welfare program that does not incentivize anybody to be on welfare. No rational person would want to be on welfare with what they get here, and they certainly are not incentivized to have any additional children.

(City Pages)

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 1 comment }

… and her explanation is utter bull****

 

Last Friday, Congress re-authorized the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). Up until this year, this has been a non-controversial bill that has made a real difference. But in this surreal Tea Party world in which women have magical rape-sperm blocking in their ladyparts and contraception equals abortion and battered women don’t give enough money to the Ignorance Caucus (the party formerly known as the Republican Party), re-authorization of VAWA was in peril.

 

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) voted against it. This isn’t surprising. She’s a national leader in the Ignorance Caucus. What is surprising is that she was the lone member of the Minnesota delegation voting against it.

 

What is sadly typical of Bachmann is her explanation. Up is down. Hammers fix all problems. The disconnect from reality remains. So does her utter disregard for the truth.

 

“Rep. Bachmann recognizes the importance of giving local law enforcement and nonprofit programs the resources they need to fight against domestic violence and sexual assault, which is why she supported the stronger House version of the Violence Against Women Act,” said Bachmann spokesman Dan Kotman.

The House bill she supported did the opposite. Lesbian and transgendered were left out. Abuse and violence toward immigrants was left out. Abuse and violence toward Native women was left out.

 

This is the worst kind of double speak from Bachmann.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 0 comments }

War on Women builds in the Upper Midwest

by Dan Burns on February 25, 2013

The War on Women proceeds, vehemently and shamelessly. It’s at least as bad as it was before the election. It seems that the crazies know, or rather crudely sense at some level below conscious comprehension, the way bugs do, that the current socio-political environment in the U.S. may be their last chance. Here’s a sampling, just from states in the Upper Midwest:

 

- The North Dakota Senate has passed a 20-week ban.

 

- The South Dakota House passed an extended waiting period; weekends and holidays would no longer count toward the current three-day delay.

 

- You may not have known that, last year, Wisconsin law making medication abortions harder to access went into effect. Planned Parenthood’s court challenge is pending.

 

- Michigan has a raft of brutal new assaults on choice, thanks to its infamous lame-duck session.

 

- After all that, this might lighten your mood, maybe just a little.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 0 comments }

Violence Against Women Act passes Senate

by Dan Burns on February 13, 2013

I follow politics, and in the contemporary U.S., that unfortunately means that I have no choice but to follow conservative politics.  Which means that I see a lot of pathetic, despicable stuff.  But rarely as, and never more, pathetic and despicable than this.

The conservative grassroots is pushing lawmakers to vote against the Senate’s reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act, which has 62 cosponsors and is slated for a final vote early this week.

Heritage Action and FreedomWorks, two well-financed right wing activist groups, are lobbying to scuttle the reauthorization. In short, they lament the expanded provisions, which beefs up funding for local law enforcement to prosecute domestic abusers while expanding coverage to gays, illegal immigrants and Native Americans. They claim VAWA hasn’t proved to be effective and argue that federal funding for law enforcement is both redundant and unconstitutional…

“Under VAWA, men effectively lose their constitutional rights to due process, presumption of innocence, equal treatment under the law, the right to a fair trial and to confront one’s accusers, the right to bear arms, and all custody/visitation rights,” the group wrote. “It is unprecedented, unnecessary and dangerous.”

It so happens that the VAWA passed the U.S. Senate today.  The linked article has a little photo group of the 22 Senators that voted against.  Note the ignorance reflected in those vile faces, the narcissism, the fear, the greed…

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 1 comment }

McCollum pushes for VAWA

by Dan Burns on January 30, 2013

From last week:

Congresswoman Betty McCollum (MN-04) joined Congresswoman Gwen Moore (D-WI) and House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member John Conyers (D-MI) in introducing the Violence Against Women Act reauthorization (H.R. 11). This bill reauthorizes protections and services that have been responsible for a 50 percent reduction in domestic violence. H.R. 11 also provides better assistance to abuse victims…

(from McCollum’s statement)”Now is the time for House Republicans to stop obstructing and support the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act.”

The atrocious behavior of House Republicans in this matter is well known.  It’s unclear, whether that will change for the better.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 1 comment }