Recent Posts

Endorsing Richard Painter for US Senate

by Invenium Viam on August 9, 2018 · 5 comments

Painter familyBut she was…
Blinded by the light
Revved up like a deuce
Another runner in the night
Blinded by the light…

Mannfred Mann’s Earth Band, 1976; lyrics by Bruce Springsteen

 

Let me be clear at the outset – given nearly any other scenario that I can imagine, I would be supporting and endorsing Tina Smith for the US Senate.

 

Instead, I’m endorsing Richard Painter. (Insert cries of derision and outrage here).

 

The reason is simple: Richard Painter is a better candidate and will make a better US Senator for the people of Minnesota.

 

And Richard Painter, unlike Tina Smith, wants Donald Trump impeached and imprisoned. That’s a BIG plus for me, even if Painter didn’t support many of the progressive policies I believe in. But he does. He comes at them from more of a wonkish angle than I would take, but he gets there in the end all the same. For example, he supports single-payer because it makes the most economic sense. For me, health care is a human right and we can pay for it by eliminating corporate welfare.

 

I’ve said before, here on MNPP, that if two candidates of different gender stack up roughly equally, I’ll preferentially support and vote for the woman. That’s because, as a member of the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party, I believe in Democratic principles of political representation. With only 23 members of the US Senate currently women, we need to double that figure to achieve something close to gender equality. So I’d much prefer not to replace Smith with Painter, if it were avoidable.

 

But this US Senate race is another situation where the party leadership has jammed their preferred candidate down our collective throats and expects us, as always, to fall in line. Had it been former Speaker of the House and Champion of All Things Righteous the Honorable Rep. Paul Thissen, I might have been able to handle their uninvited intimacy with good grace. But they picked another Bogan top-sider and I, for one, am Reggae Tired of t’all, mon. I’ve said many times that all the party leadership really wants from its activists is money, time and shoe-leather (our candidates excepted). When it comes to influencing the appointment of candidates that we’d like to see in office, the attitude among the party leadership is: Stay in your lane and let the grown-ups make the important decisions. We got this.

 

That’s exactly what they did with Tina Smith: a vacuous tool of the party bosses, an uninspiring wallflower of a political candidate, and no-show when it comes to many of the issues that the DFL rank-and-file care most about including environmental protections, opposition to nickel-sulfide mining in the Boundary Waters, single-payer healthcare, economic relief for the middle-class, and so on.

 

It’s nothing new. That’s exactly what they did when they fronted Skip Humphrey for Governor in 1998. Humphrey, a feckless gadabout in the Minnesota Senate who was never heard from again, was shaping up to lose the election against former DFL’er and St. Paul Mayor Norm Coleman, now (then) running as a Republican. That is, until a former Navy Seal, former bouncer at Moby Dick’s, former WWF pro wrestler, former Mongols M.C. biker, former action film actor, and former Mayor of Brooklyn Park, threw his hat into ring. Minnesota voters loved it.

 

That’s politics. The stakes are so high that everybody’s trying to queer the game in their favor. It’s not that I really blame them for doing it. I blame them for getting it wrong. As a friend once told me, “It ain’t illegal until you get caught.”

 

Well, the DFL over-seers done got caught. Nobody really knows Smith. She looks like the shy girl who came with a friend that everybody ignores at the after-game party. Her campaign is lifeless. Her campaign team is clueless. Plato Boulevard is on auto-pilot. And the political cross-currents created by #45 among progressives of all stripes across Minnesota are threatening to swamp her boat.

 

Tellingly, the word on the street is that internal polls show Painter running neck-and-neck against Smith. Oh, you’ll hear plenty of denials, but a big reason for all the sulfur and brimstone coming from DFL-HQ against Painter speaks volumes: The numbers ain’t lookin’ too pretty. If Painter were 20 points back, Ken Martin would be extolling the virtues of an inclusive, Big Tent Party. But it looks like Smith could lose. With less than a week to go, panic is starting to set in.

 

Add to all that the likelihood of a massive turn-out of primary voters on August 14 due to a high energy, high interest gubernatorial contest – not to mention a high energy, high interest congressional contest in the 5th CD – and you have the makings of a … a … my god, dare I say it … a popular referendum on the current leadership of DFL party. It won’t be the party rank-and-file who decide this primary election. It’ll be any voter who decides to vote the Democrat side of the ballot. A lot of them will be unhappy millennials, current Berniecrats and new voters. In light of the progressive contingency that detonated the DFL State Convention last June, dude, that can’t be good.

 

One week from today, it will all be over but the weeping and the shouting. If things turn out the way I suspect they’re going to, a lot of resumes will hit the job boards on August 15.
 
Comment below fold.
 

Comments
 
From Mac Hall: Gotta disagree.
 
IMO, How Tina Smith got the job is not the question. (Yes, I understand that she may have been “chosen” but that’s the way things work when an opening occurs … the Governor is in charge — [BTW a good reason to consider would Jeff Johnson give the job to Michele Bachmann if something happened to Amy Klobuchar … that’s scary.])
 
So, if the question is not how she got the job, but instead how is she doing ? Well, look at the bills that she has sponsored and the bills she has voted on. Some of the more recent ones are :
 
S2775 Investing in 21st Century Workforce Partnerships Act
S2821 Mark Takai Atomic Veterans Healthcare Parity Act
S3029 Prematurity Research Expansion and Education for Mothers
 
Hmmm … focused on jobs, veterans and mothers.
 
Her votes:
Reinstate Net Neutrality
Opposing Trump nominees for HHS, State and CIA
Opposed Trump immigration policies
Opposed changes to bank regulations.
 
So, I gotta ask … Why do I want to fire her ? It wouldn’t be because of her votes or bills … and besides, she has traveled Minnesota for years … she may not be flashy, but she has made connections. What do we know about Richard Painter ? He’s a smart guy … and if this was an open seat, I would still want to know more.
 

Besides, it’s too late … my bride and I already cast our votes … for Tina Smith.
 
From Dan: There are very few Democrats who I would refuse to vote for in a general election. I will hold my nose and vote for just about any Democrat. Richard Painter is one of the few exceptions. I know Painter mostly through twitter, where he has demonstrated that he is a dishonest, vile, abusive misogynistic piece of garbage. A truly horrible human being. I don’t like Lori Swanson, but she is nowhere near the ethical cesspool Painter resides in.
 
The good news is that Smith is going to crush him. Martin is going after him being Painter is a serial liar who is unfit for public office.
 
From Dan: I’d love to see the “internal polls” that showed a neck and neck race. I guess she only beat him by 63 points.
 
At least Painter can stop pretending to be a Democrat.
 

Previous post:

Next post: