Recent Posts

Media needs to do better on bogus abortion reversal claims

by Dan Burns on September 1, 2017

66758002As you’ve undoubtedly noted, with the horrific results of the last election the zealots are more fanatical than ever.

The latest tactic to advance this argument is the so-called abortion reversal – an unproven treatment that supposedly counters the effect of mifepristone, the first pill used in the two-drug regimen of medication abortion. “Reversal” advocates claim this therapy can give patients a “second chance” to keep their baby.
(The Guardian)

A so-called abortion reversal procedure lacks sound scientific support, but that hasn’t stopped anti-abortion groups from promoting it to inaccurately suggest patients inherently regret their decision to have an abortion. As anti-choice groups increasingly lobby for the elimination of abortion access, media often treat anti-choice pseudo-science, like abortion reversal, as the “other side” of the issue. But five media outlets recently provided comprehensive debunks that show how their counterparts should be reporting on abortion reversal and the junk science behind the procedure.
(Media Matters)

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: