Another recent indicator that Rep. Erik Paulsen (R-MN) may be the current U.S. House’s most atrociously fake “moderate” was his intent to vote for Trumpcare 1.0, had it come to a vote there. So we’ll see where he’s at on the next iteration.
Based on our analysis, we estimate that individuals with even relatively mild pre-existing conditions would pay thousands of dollars above standard rates to obtain coverage. For example, because an individual with asthma costs an issuer 106 percent more than a healthy 40-year-old, she would face a premium surcharge of $4,340. The surcharge for diabetes would be $5,600 per year. Coverage could become prohibitively expensive for those in dire need of care: Insurers would charge about $17,320 more in premiums for pregnancy, $26,580 more for rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune disorders, and $142,650 more for patients with metastatic cancer.
(Center for American Progress)
An additional Paulsen thing, about the fact that suspending the medical device tax has not resulted in any U.S. jobs boom in the industry: “Was Erik Paulsen Duped By Medical Devicemakers Or Is He Promoting Alternative Facts?” (MN Political Roundtable)
Comment below fold.
From Mac Hall: Hmmm … let’s see so if you are a woman who delivered a healthy baby and had no complications, you still get to pay more (last one on the list). Good to know that there is not a War On Women any more … it’s a War On Mommies.
And let’s look at the third item on your list … Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women in the United States and the second leading cause in men. It is expected to cause about 50,260 deaths during 2017. Of course, you could get screened … but that would mean that you would pay a higher premium … so is it better to just die ?
BTW … I guess that means that H.R. 1017 The Removing Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Act, isn’t necessary anymore.
No wonder I see that Erik Paulsen has been tweeting pictures of him in doctor’s garb (most recently at Mercy Hospital with Dr. Stark performing a heart valve procedure … he must be checking up to be sure that everyone who meets #10 on the list gets to pay a little more.
FYI from the Business Insider:
These changes were not enough for some members of the Freedom Caucus, according to reports. Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, a prominent member of the Freedom Caucus, told reporters that essential health benefit repeal was not enough and “it’s always been beyond that.”
The freedom Caucus has reportedly asked for a repeal of some “Title 1 provisions” in the ACA. These provisions do things like prevent insurers from denying coverage based on a pre-existing condition, allow children to stay on their parents insurance until they turn 26 years old, and annual limits on healthcare costs.