Recent Posts

Racism

Mike Parry tweets ignorant, racist comparison

by The Big E on January 18, 2013

Just because Mike Parry is no longer a legislator doesn’t mean he’ll stop bringing the crazy and bringing it hard. Parry is still angry about a whole lot of things and decided he would share his rage on Twitter.

What categories should this tweet fall into:

  1. Ignorance?
  2. Racism?
  3. Historical Revisionism?

While I’m glad this moran is now just a self-important buffoon and does not have any means to make his deranged, revisionist dreams reality, I’m kinda missing him. Now we only have Rep. Mary Franson and Rep. Steve Drazkowski as legitimate purveyors of right wing crazy. Who’s going to carry the Sceptre of Crazy in the Minnesota Senate?

Bluestem Prairie has a few of the responses to Parry.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 0 comments }

Remember how Republican candidates this past election lauded the Real Americans they’d meet in some podunk Republican stronghold? Remember how this implied that all of us Americans who live on the West Coast or in cities or in the North East of the US weren’t Real Americans?

I found this tweet from Minnesotans for Marriage campaign manager Andy Parrish interesting:


This fits the Fox News Republican Tea Party narrative that only the God-fearing, immigrant hating, gay hating, Obama haters are real Americans. The demographic problem with this narrative is a majority of Americans now live in metropolitan areas.

But I think Parrish’s quip get to something deeper. The racist, hate-filled right wing vision of his America was mostly destroyed last Tuesday. Gay Marriage is the law in 3 more states. Obama won despite a weak economy and the bazillions of dollars spent by SuperPACs to buy this election for Mitt Romney. A diarist at Daily Kos nailed it>:

Let me share this brief back and forth I had today in one of the forums I frequent, with a severely conservative, Christian man I assume from the context of previous postings, to be in the 50-60 year old range.  Let’s call him Bob and it all started with this question:
Bob – Is it America voting for President, or immigrants? Are immigrants really American, or just trying to be American?

Vent – America is immigrants. Without immigrants, there is no America, there are no Founding Fathers, there is no Constitution. Nuff said!

Bob – Obviously the exemplary argument.

Vent – Sorry if you hate what America is but those are the facts. The only “real” American’s are Native Americans. Everyone else is either an immigrant, a descendent of immigrants or a descendent of slavery.

Bob – It looks like you are the one that hates America for what it is, or was, or whatever. There is evidence that white people were in America prior to the “Native” Americans. The cave in Utah had tall red headed people in them, killed by “Natives”. The magical land bridge the “Natives” crossed from Russia, into Alaska, and etc….

At this point I realized we’d run out of tin foil on aisle 4 and as I walked away from the computer I laughed thinking, “this is the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard.”  But then my laughter turned to confusion and then sadness as I began to process what he was really trying to say to me.  I obviously understood he was in mourning over the loss but as I dwelled on this brief exchange, I began to realize that it’s about much more than his candidate simply not winning and far beyond any political party.  This was much deeper than all of that.

What Bob had really lost in this election was his vision of America.  The vision that had been preserved since before he was born and the vision he grew up fighting to preserve.  Now, we’re not talking about a “Romney” vision of America where it’s about making the rich, richer with more trickle down economics.  No, he was talking about an America of, by and for white people.  With the re-election of Barack Obama, he saw his vision of America crumble for good and it’s the same vision that all of conservatism saw crumble.

The depths of depression and soul searching going on in the GOP is rooted in that thinking.  For them it’s the same.  It’s not just losing an election.  This election was special.  This election was for all the marbles but not because they want to cut spending or balance the budget for fear of rising debt. No, that’s just a smoke screen for the agenda that has survived for way to long.
[my emphasis]

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 4 comments }

GOP Senator Dan Hall is one of the “new breed” of Republicans “serving” in St. Paul; first elected in 2010 he seems to be tossin’ his hat into the ring to replace RWNJ Mike Parry in the next session.  Look at this tweet Hall recently sent out; it says:  Why is it you never see an American flag where you see a Vote No for the Mn #Marriage Amendment sign? #mngop pic.twitter.com/KTCpstHs

So, if you disagree with Senator Dan Hall’s religious beliefs, you’re un-American??!?

Not surprising, from a guy who said last year:  “I watched Minneapolis get destroyed, so I not only didn’t want my kids in the school system… I took them out of Minneapolis because they ruined our neighborhoods with integration and segregation.”

Reading Hall’s tweet, that those that will vote no this November are essentially un-American,  reminds me of what Samuel Johnson wrote in 1775:  “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.”  

And Dan Hall is making a bold play to replace Mike Parry as the GOP Senate Caucus’ premier Right Wing Nut Job.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 12 comments }

Bachmann makes ‘tar baby’ reference to Obama

by The Big E on April 20, 2012

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) used a ‘tar baby’ reference when speaking about President Barack Obama and gas prices. Bachmann was appearing on a right wing radio show. Right wing talk radio is a comfort zone for here we she feels safe to say what she really believes.

Prior to her ascension to the national political stage, Bachmann’s racist, homophobic and crazed quips were ignored by Minnesota’s media. But now that she’s hit the big time, what she says is actually getting reported.

Rep. Michele Bachmann accused President Barack Obama of “waving a tar baby in the air” by blaming oil speculators for the “poor choices” he’s made for energy policy.

“This is just about waving a tar baby in the air and saying that something else is a problem. I have never seen a more irresponsible president who is infantile in the way that he continually blames everybody else for his failure to first diagnose the problem, and second, to address the problem. It’s always everyone else’s fault,” the Minnesota Republican told Florida-based conservative blog The Shark Tank in an interview on Wednesday.
(Politico)

Bachmann has mostly been able to ignore, brush off or evade any real consequences for her lying, insanity, racism and bigotry in the past.

Her first real consequence for her utter disregard for the truth was the HPV Vaccine conspiracy theory that led to her presidential campaign derailing.

Will this bigoted gaffe cause real damage?

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 2 comments }

Mike Parry shows his insensitive side again

by The Big E on July 29, 2011

Sen. Mike Parry (R-Waseca) is a man of many talents.  He’s rude, a conspiracy theorist, racist, homophobic and ignorant of what’s in our state’s constitution.  In addition to all these fine qualities, he’s also a cold-hearted  and insensitive guy.  

Let’s play a little Jeopardy-style game.  What was Sen. Parry responding to when he said the following?  Be sure to make your response in the form of a question …

“We’ll always have this problem unless we decide who needs money; we’re so anxious to give money away to make someone feel good,” said Parry.

“Take personal responsibility; take government out of people’s lives,” he said. “How do we change the lifestyles of those in the entitlement mentality?”
(Bluestem Prairie)


What does Sen. Mike Parry think of the budget cuts negatively affecting poor drug addicts seeking treatment and cities facing massive cuts which likely include police and firefighters?

Yes, that’s right.  You win $300 in the Jerkwad Teabagger category.

Here are the details:

But now that there’s a budget agreement, Parry recommends stoicism. The Waseca County News reports in County, state discuss budget that the Emo Senator got all scornful at a meeting  set up by Waseca County Commissioners, who invited Parry, Rep. Kory Kath,  Rep. Tony Cornish and Sen. Julie Rosen, R-Fairmont to discuss the shutdown and its fallout.

The paper reports the concerns county and city staff and electeds shared with the state legislators:

For Steve Peterson, Court Services director, his biggest concern is chemical dependency funding. The county is now required to provide 15 percent of the cost of chemical dependency treatment for indigent residents, he said.

“It will possibly curtail people from getting into treatment,” said Peterson. Overall, Waseca County loses $6,000 in County Program Aid and $200,000 from the elimination of the Market Value Homestead Credit program as the result of the state budget.

Waseca City Manager Crystal Prentice said she found the shutdown irritating but the final budget is “much more alarming.”

In the past four years, she said, the city of Waseca has lost $1,729,539 in state aids and credits. She asked the representatives what they can do to become change agents so they can compromise and produce balanced budgets that don’t hurt the people they are serving?

Les Tlougan, Waseca City Council member, said the new budget leaves a lot of people, cities and counties in the lurch. In Waseca, Local Government Aid accounts for 40 percent of the budget, he said. If the legislators feel Waseca can live at 60 percent of revenue, that means cuts in security, water, streets, and sewers, said Tlougan.

“If we raise taxes, some legislators say, ‘It’s your fault; you made the choice.’ Did we?” he said.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 0 comments }

The Fading Allure of the Tea Party Movement

by SJGulitti on April 24, 2011

For the newly elected Tea Party backed Republicans and their supporters, the easy part is over. Now that they have arrived on Capitol Hill and in statehouses across the country, the hard part is just beginning. At this early date, the news for the Tea Party movement has already become less than encouraging. A series of new polling reveals that the movement has sunk to a level of favorability on par with political parties that it came to Washington to either reform or replace. Recent results from a CBS/New York Times poll conducted between April 15 and the 20th reveals a movement that has sunk to a 26 percent favorability rating. These results are lower than those presented just last month by CNN and Washington Post polls, which found: “Forty-seven percent of people questioned say they have an unfavorable view of the Tea Party, up four points from December and an increase of 21 points from January 2010.” At that time, the percentage of people who saw the Tea Party in a favorable light had slumped to 32 percent, its lowest positive rating up until that time. These findings are consistent with those of the New York Times, which show that the Tea Party has been growing steadily less popular over the past year. Consistent with the aforementioned findings, the fall off in popularity for the Tea Party movement had likewise been documented by conservative sources like RealClear Politics.com and the UK Guardian starting in the summer of 2010.

Chris Cillizza, of the Washington Post suggests that the “familiarity breeds contempt” concept may be at work here as well: “It also could be that as the tea party has become better known and better defined some people who initially said they liked the movement even though they knew little about it have grown disenchanted as they have learned more.” Cillizza’s view is backed up by the latest Pew Research findings on the topic of the movement’s declining popularity. To wit: “As the Tea Party has evolved from a grassroots movement to become a major force on Capitol Hill, public views of the Tea Party have grown more negative. Slightly more disagree with the Tea Party than agree with the movement — a reversal in public evaluations from a year ago.” The Pew findings show that the rise in the Tea Party’s unpopularity is largely a function of dissatisfaction among independent voters and Democrats either who may have initially been sympathetic to the movement’s goals or who had not previously held a strong opinion on the movement and its political program. Pollsters also attribute the decline to a drop off in support from those earning less than $50,000 a year, a threshold that represents roughly the mid point in American incomes.

A compendium of polling results presently available on PollingReport.com also reinforces the image of a Tea Party movement increasingly unpopular with the wider public. While one poll shows that 50 percent of those surveyed felt that the movement has had a positive effect on the country thus far, consistent majorities in the neighborhood of 60 percent plus continue to say that they are not supporters of the movement. Thus, it would appear that roughly half of the American public feels that the shake up provided to the system by the Tea Party has been of value; roughly, two thirds of these people still do not see that fact as motivation enough to lead them to identify positively with the movement. I myself undertook an analysis of twenty-nine different polling organizations, including the conservative Fox News Polls, Rasmussen Reports and the Marist Polls and nowhere did I find any polling results contrary to the evidence of a decline in popularity for the Tea Party movement as presented above.

While polls are but a snapshot in time, and as such are subject to divergent analysis, the overall trend in popularity for the Tea Party movement remains on a downward trajectory. I believe there is little in the way of likely future developments that will reverse this trend. My belief is that the fortunes of the Tea Party movement will continue to decline because of several factors, which the movement cannot address without a major restructuring of its core ideology. That restructuring would require elemental adjustments beyond its ideological foundation, which would redefine the movement to such an extent that it, would cease to be politically relevant. For one, the movement’s newly elected lawmakers will not be able to stick to their pledge of not raising taxes as part of deficit reduction measures unless they want to be on the losing side of the political outcome. Their divergent views with the general public vis a vis entitlement programs and the penchant for obstruction verses compromise are at variance with public opinion generally. Intra-party conflicts within the G.O.P. and problems related to the quality of the Tea Party’s leadership cadre further complicate the long-term viability of the movement in the larger competition for the allegiance of independent voters. The propensity towards anti-intellectual and anti-elitist rhetoric in an age of increasing globalization and technological complexity can only hamper the Tea Party movement in its development of political and economic programs. Lastly, the lingering allegations that the movement is tainted with racist and anti-immigrant sentiments is a major negative in a society where white voters will soon cease to be a majority. Each of the aforementioned deserves separate and focused analysis, which will appear in subsequent articles. Till then stay tuned and have a happy Easter and Passover holiday.

Steven J. Gulitti
4/23/2011

Sources:

CNN Poll: Unfavorable view of tea party on the rise
http://politicalticker.blogs.c…

Washington Post-ABC News Poll (Item 36)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…

Tea Party: Better Known, Less Popular
More Negative Views Among Independents, Moderate Republicans
http://pewresearch.org/pubs/19…

PollingReport.com
http://www.pollingreport.com/p…

Chris Cillizza: Tea party unpopularity on the rise
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…

Tea Party movement dips in popularity
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worl…

Is the Tea Party’s Popularity Slipping?
http://www.realclearpolitics.c…

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 0 comments }

LMAO? WHAT’S SO FUNNY ABOUT RACISM?

by TakeActionMN on April 1, 2011

On the heels of an offensive song aimed at the Hmong community, TakeAction Minnesota sent a letter to KDWB 101.3′s Program Director, Rob Morris, taking the popular Twin Cities radio station to task for its racist on-air display.  The full content of the letter is as follows:  

“Recently KDWB’s Morning Show laughed about a parody song of the Hmong people, sung to the tune of Eric Clapton’s ‘Tears in Heaven.’  Yesterday, the station issued a weak apology that does nothing to accept real responsibility for its actions and offers no indication that it will stop using racism as a way to entertain its audience.  The station needs to take sincere accountability for its actions and commit to change its ways.

Dave Ryan and his sidekick Steve LaTart (Steve-O) think it’s funny to mock the Hmong people and culture.  In doing so, they reinforce the racism that divides Minnesotans from each other while making it harder for people of color to prosper.  The song that was performed on last week’s program was not the first time that these two morning personalities used racism to entertain.  It was simply the most offensive effort to date.  

The apology posted on KDWB’s Facebook page notes the positive feedback they have received from Hmong listeners.  Clearly the station isn’t paying attention to the real harm its actions have caused.  The apology also states that “it was never its intention to offend anyone.”  This is absurd as that is exactly the kind of humor the Morning Show practices – that’s why this song was performed in the first place.

KDWB has tremendous power to reach people and influence their thinking.  Their recent actions demonstrate that the station is ok with promoting racist attitudes as a way to entertain.  

If KDWB wishes to be a positive member of the Twin Cities community, then it must accept sincere accountability for its actions and change its behavior.

We call on the management of KDWB to:

1) Fire Steve LaTart – the author and performer of the offensive song
2) Hold an on air conversation with Hmong community leaders during the Morning Show to discuss racial stereotypes, racial disparities, and the harm caused by Morning Show personalities
3) Meet with leaders of the Hmong community leaders to discuss these demands within the next two weeks

We look forward to KDWB’s positive response to our request.”

TakeAction Minnesota and its Hmong Organizing Program have been working for over 10 years to develop strong community leaders to make positive changes that improve the lives of the Hmong and all people.  TakeAction Minnesota is an organization of 11,000 individual members and 23 organizations who are committed to furthering racial, social, and economic justice.  


facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 0 comments }

Minnesota Republicans are focused like lasers on creating jobs in MN.  To that end, Rep. Steve Drazkowski (R-Mazeppa) has introduced some racist, social-issue legislation at the MN State Capitol that won’t create a single job.  Last session, he introduced an AZ-style immmigration bill.  This time he is joined by Bob Barrett (R-Shafer), Mike Benson (R-Rochester) and Glenn Gruenhagen (R-Glencoe) in introducing HR348.  Minnesota Independent has the details:

Minnesota House Republicans introduced a bill Monday that would prevent cities, counties and other local governments from making laws related to immigration enforcement. St. Paul, Minneapolis and Worthington have ordinances on the books that direct city employees to check the immigration status of their residents only in certain instances and instead leave immigration enforcement to federal officials. These “sanctuary cities” are the target of HF348, which would invalidate those local ordinances.

Here’s what is so particularly idiotic about this proposal:  cities are already facing police cuts because the legislature is going to slash Local Government Aid (LGA) again.  So on top of their other duties, they will now be forced to become the immigration police.

Furthermore, if minority communities are fearful of approaching the police, it will simply raise the crime rate.  If criminals know that minorities can’t go to the police, they’ll target them for all kinds of extortion, theft and worse crimes.  All the years of work by police departments across the state to build a better rapport with minority communities will be lost.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 1 comment }

GOP American baby flow chart

by BlueCollar Daughter on August 14, 2010


It’s becoming more and more clear lately that the GOP has now added babies to the long list of things they hate.  Well, some babies.  Which babies?  That is becoming less and less clear.

I propose a flow chart to help us understand, or some kind of national color-coded tabbing system. I mean, when it comes to the value, viability, personhood and citizenship of infants, we outta make sure everyone is being very, very clear.  Right?  We can at least agree that the status of no baby should be left behind…uh, I mean, misunderstood?

I am notoriously terrible at organizational charting, graphs, tables, etc. (math anxiety), so let me do my best to shed light on this whole issue by using my words (and of course the GOP’s!).
1.ALL BABIES.  The first thing we can assume is that the GOP is in favor of all babies.  Well, they are in favor of the birth of all babies.  This is demonstrated by how much they pontificate on and lobby against the pro-choice right to abortion, even recently arguing against a woman’s rights in cases of rape and incest. That is some pretty indisputable baby (or at least birth) lovin’, right?
2.”AMERICAN BABIES”.  The GOP loves American babies a little more than other babies, I think we can admit. Many of them really hate to send aid to babies in the 3rd world. The problem now, though, is they don’t want all babies born in America to be classified as American babies either, and that is a head-scratcher for me!  Flow chart!  Apparently there is something less American about American babies whose parents weren’t American (whew, glad my parents, the kids of immigrants, got grandfathered into being “American babies” or I might be here on a visa right now!).
3.FINANCIALLY STABLE BABIES. Glenn Thrush of the NYTimes wrote an interesting article about this being the “Summer of No Love.” We are in very straining economic times, and that breeds fear and resentment and xenophobia in people. Well, apparently, the more depressed the economy, the more the GOP is afraid of poor babies, and they would just as soon the millions of Americans suffering and struggling in this financial climate not produce babies, and that the babies out there with financial need somehow take a powder  (for some reason this also seems to be extended to “brown babies”, and I can tell you I really need some color tabs now!). Maybe these babies should relinquish their citizenship?

Now, I hope it’s a little more clear where the GOP stands on babies, per se, although I know there remain (for me anyway) many nagging questions that could perhaps be helped with charts. Don’t worry, though.  I’m sure as the elections approach, Republicans will  propose many, many more “baby problem” solutions.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 0 comments }

Pawlenty endorses English-only for Minnesota

by The Big E on August 5, 2010

Lame duck Minnesota Governor and 2012 Republican presidential no-hoper Tim Pawlenty endorsed the English-only plank of the far right’s agenda.  With his presidential polling numbers languishing in the lower single digits, Pawlenty needs to do everything and anything he catch the attention the Republican party base.  If this means endorsing racism, so be it.

Pawlenty was asked to comment on Lino Lakes passing an ordinance making English it’s only language.

Such a measure could spare governments translation costs, but impose a new level of difficulty on the state’s immigrant population.

At a news conference outside the governor’s residence, Pawlenty said that as the country becomes more diverse, some people might question which language to use in official documents. He said it might be helpful to clarify that the official language is English.

Spokesman Bruce Gordon said Pawlenty made the comments when asked about his support for so-called English-only measures, such as one recently approved in the northern suburb of Lino Lakes. Pawlenty’s comments came shortly after a meeting with Chilean ambassador Arturo Fermandois. The two talked about investment partnerships between Minnesota and Chile, including a northeastern Minnesota mining venture involving Chilean companies.


facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 1 comment }