Recent Posts

Xcel

MN Republican Gubernatorial candidate  Tom Emmer is going to start focusing on “the Help”:  Since they, according to him, already make “over $100,000″ as waiters and bartenders, they should get a cut in pay from their employer.  

As MinnPost notes:

Wage stats from Minnesota’s Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) indicate that those $100,000 servers are the rarest of people.

The median wage for the 45,000 waiters and waitresses in the state is $9.36 an hour, including tips, meaning that if a server is working full time, he or she could make a little more than $19,000 a year. In the Twin Cities, servers do a little better – the median hourly wage is $10.57. But the waiter in southwestern Minnesota is being paid less than $8 an hour, including tips, according to the state’s statistics.

Emmer, who spoke at the Eagle Street Grill, a popular hot spot at the Xcel Energy Center in St Paul, said the owner told him that three of the restaurant staffs are taking over $100,000 a year.  Emmer, who’s apparently only looking out for the little guy, sprung the idea on the crowd.  (Which, I’m sure, became the worst group of tippers the Eagle Street Grill has seen in years.)

His complaint doesn’t make a lot of sense because it flies in the face of the GOP’s track-record!  If what he says is true, then why wouldn’t he be pushing for tax breaks for these wealthy bartenders and waiters?!  And, shouldn’t they be permanent tax-cuts?!  If everybody is tipping 20% of their drink and meal tabs, then why would the bar/restaurant owners care about a measly $9.36 per hour wage?  If my math is correct; with a generous 20% gratuity per tab equates to an excess of $100,000 annually per waiter, then the restaurant owner is pulling in excess of $500,000 per year, per waiter/bartender!  That only means permanent tax-breaks for everybody that works at that place!!

My dear departed grandmother worked most of her adult life as a waitress at Bill’s Cafe in Deer River, Minnesota.  Let me be the first to inform Tom Emmer: Grandma never made $100,000 a year in tips.

I’m going out on a limb here, I know; but I think Tom Emmer is a giant sized gift for the DFL in November.  If he’s got the time time brag how he’ll cut Minnesota’s budget easily by $12 billion in his first two years, he’s probably got time to talk to his “$100,000 waiter” who’s asking him if he wants fries with that.  

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 0 comments }

Big Stone II: Huge Coal Plant Plans Dropped!

by Grace Kelly on November 3, 2009

Side Note: Right after the election, I am starting a series of original research articles on community policing, foreclosures and local economics. This includes information not published elsewhere, so stay tuned after the election! – Kelly

A big announcement today of dropped plans for a giant Big Stone II coal-energy plant, planned for our South Dakota border, where the prevailing east wind would have dropped most of pollution right into Minnesota.

A power plant ran out of steam Monday as developers announced that they have decided not to build the $1.6 billion Big Stone II project near South Dakota’s border with Minnesota. The joint announcement by four utilities brings to an end one of the larger environmental debates in the state in recent years because of mounting public concerns about global warming and energy policy.

Seven utilities were partners when the 500- to 600-megawatt coal-fired plant was announced in 2004, but three dropped out.

(Star Tribune)

62% of Minnesota’s energy comes from coal! Minnesota still has 13 coal-fired plants . These plants tend to be older plants grandfathered out of complying with the clean air act. In other words, these plants are dirtier polluters. Our heavy reliance on coal in Minnesota is one of the invisible media stories never told. These dropped plans might actually indicate a change in direction!

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 0 comments }

Harm from XCEL Hiawatha Project?

by Grace Kelly on July 20, 2009

XCEL expects to be able to put high transmission lines along 26th Street, 28th Street or the Greenway. Around a high voltage line is an electromagnetic field widely believed to have negative effects on health. Here is the drop off chart that shows that about 60 – 70 feet is needed before the electromagnetic field returns to normal. Within 60 – 70 feet of these routes is significant high impact residential housing and general human activity. If only 115kV is used, then this chart looks like about 30 feet is needed.

Now just like the smoking studies, there appear to be studies on the harm with different results. I trust my childhood experiences with farmers who said similar things to this report:

A landmark court ruling in France has seen the country’s electricity grid operator, RTE, fined 390,000 Euros for harm caused to livestock on a farm underneath one of its high voltage power lines.  The livestock, owned by a family in Latronche, near Bourges, suffered ulcers, bleeding, muscular paralysis and death.  The family were eventually forced to move out of the farmhouse to a nearby caravan to escape their own worsening health problems which they blamed on the power line, including respiratory problems and deafness.  ”Even if this wasn’t proved scientifically and with certainty, the judge considered there was no other possibility,” the court prosecutor told Reuters news agency.  RTE plans to appeal the judgment.
(Ecologist – under subscription barrior”)


Christine Frank, Volunteer Coordinator of Climate Crisis Coalition of the Twin Cities is allowing me to re-publish her remarks to XCEL:

3CTC’S MAIN ENVIRONMENTAL AND HEALTH CONCERNS

The Climate Crisis Coalition of the Twin Cities (3CTC) is opposed to Xcel Energy’s Hiawatha Transmission Line Project for its potential contribution to climate change and the health impacts of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and the widespread use of wooden utility poles soaked in pentachlorophenol pesticide (Penta) upon all Life-human beings, domestic animals and urban wildlife–that will be residing within the immediate vicinity of the power lines and substations.  3CTC strongly urges that the Minnesota Department of Commerce Office of Energy Security take these serious environmental and health effects as outlined below into consideration when drafting the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

CLEAN, RENEWABLE, NON-IRRADIATED VS. DIRTY, RADIOACTIVE ENERGY

Xcel proposes to transmit into the Hiawatha neighborhood by archaic and inefficient means what will be more predominantly dirty energy, spewing forth more greenhouse and acid-precipitation gases as well as toxic mercury emissions from what we suspect will be mostly coal-fired power with only a token amount of wind energy wired in from Southwestern Minnesota.  Also included in the mix, will likely be power from one or another of the state’s nuclear reactors, which are by no means green because of their routine radioactive emissions, ever-growing and increasingly insurmountable radioactive waste problem that will plague future generations ad infinitum and the continual threat of catastrophic accident that looms over us from Xcel’s steadily aging and deteriorating nuclear power stations.  Likewise, the use of nukes is not an appropriate means to stabilize the climate since greenhouse gases are generated in every stage of the nuclear cycle from cradle to… well, there is no grave, now, is there?  Most noteworthy are the tons of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) emitted by uranium fuel-rod production.  CFCs not only warm the atmosphere, they deplete the ozone layer, a condition which is exacerbating climate change in the polar regions.  Therefore, the only thing “green” about nukes is the money it takes to build and insure them at taxpayers’ expense.

With carbon dioxide emissions having spiked every year this century at the rate of 2 parts per million annually and over 40 percent of them coming from coal-fired power plants, it is astounding that even more filthy fossil fuels will be burned to achieve Xcel’s proposed electrical upgrade in the Hiawatha Community.  Clearly, there is a need for improvement because the area has been receiving inferior service for decades and has had to cope with numerous power outages.  However, the solution is not conducting business as usual, not with Earth’s ice masses melting down and the planet racing relentlessly toward irreversible tipping points that will plunge it into complete climate chaos if we do not cease and desist our destructive ways immediately.  Time is running out, yet power companies like Xcel insist on following the path of least resistance with the same old scenario when there clearly is no need for it.  There is an ecological and healthy alternative to Xcel spending millions on its proposed HVTL and substations.  Along with economic stimulus money, the funds could be utilized to install a battery of aeroturbines of either vertical or horizontal design and solar panels on the roofs of neighborhood schools, libraries, hospitals, community centers, housing complexes such as Little Earth and industrial and commercial buildings.  This would transform the community from a consumer of dirty energy into a producer of clean energy that could also be used to power mass transit.  In addition, renewable energy systems would provide green jobs for members of the community who could be employed installing and maintaining them.

A SMART GRID VS. A DUM GRID

Obviously, it is important to provide power when it is needed and prevent brownouts and blackouts.  Because of friction on the wires, the amount of wasted energy is huge on the present electrical grid that delivers alternating current.  The loss of power is 26 to 30 percent with an efficiency of only 70%-74%.  3CTC feels it is criminal to waste anything, especially clean energy. That is why an intelligent, efficient transmission system is needed.  Many community activists pin their hopes on it as an alternative to Xcel’s HVTL/Substation concept.  However, despite the big deal made out of the Smart Grid Project that has been launched in Boulder, CO, it is apparent that the utility giant is not that serious about implementing its prototype nationwide.  Tom Henley, an Xcel Energy spokesperson in Denver has said that it will be early 2010 before the company knows how much is being saved in energy and money on the project.  Only then, can it consider expanding beyond Boulder, meaning that a cost-benefit analysis will be done on the experience to determine whether or not it will be lucrative to implement it throughout the country.  The climate and the environment are, of course, secondary considerations.  That is why 3CTC is for clean, reliable, renewable wind and solar power working in tandem so that one can back the other up and be delivered where needed by a smart grid. This will enable us to put planetary and human needs before private profits and SAVE MOTHER EARTH from climate catastrophe.

THE HEALTH IMPACTS OF EXPOSURE TO ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS

There is growing evidence that exposure to electromagnetic fields has serious health impacts upon electrical industry workers and on other people, especially children, as well as livestock, wildlife and vegetation that exist near HVTLs.

EMF EXPOSURE AND LOW-GRADE HEALTH PROBLEMS:  In 1972, Soviet research linked EMFs with fatigue, headaches and depression among people exposed.

EMFs AND CANCER:  Studies conducted in the 1980s showed a correlation between EMF strength and proximity to residences and the risk of childhood leukemia.  Epidemiological studies indicate a slight increase in childhood leukemia rates among youngsters living near power lines and an increase in chronic leukemia among adults who work in electricity-intensive industries. Washington state mortality data of 438,000 workers between 1950-79 showed elevated leukemia deaths in 10 of 11 occupations that involve extremely low frequency EMFs (ELF-EMFs).  High rates of fatal brain cancers have been found among workers in the industry as well.  ELF-EMFs may be too weak to kill cells or cause mutations and thus initiate cancer.  However, they can play a role during the promotion stage of a cancer, which involves epigenetic mechanisms that affect gene expression rather than gene structure and induce cancer in cells that have already mutated.  Thus, it has been demonstrated that EMFs help synergistically to promote tumors that have been initiated by carcinogenic chemicals in the environment.   In addition, it is known that EMFs suppress the body’s production of melatonin.  Exposure to even low-frequency EMFs of 50 to 60 Hz reduces the pineal gland’s output of the hormone, which regulates cell growth and can block tumor formation.  Suppressed melatonin levels are linked to many cancers, including breast cancer among women.  That is why female electrical workers run a two-fold risk of getting this type of reproductive cancer.    Therefore, ELF-EMFs affect very powerful hormonal mechanisms in the central nervous system and brain which in turn connect to cancer and cancer-related problems.  Exposure to them affects the control and regulation of growth in both healthy and abnormal cells.  They can affect the immune system by reducing the ability of circulating white blood cells to kill tumor cells as has been exhibited in cell-culture work and partially corroborated in animal studies.

FETAL DEVELOPMENT:  Exposure to ELF-EMFs when an expectant mother uses an electric blanket, can affect fetal development with there being evidence for not only birth abnormalities but also miscarriages.  Many farmers living near high-voltage power lines claim exposure to EMFs causes miscarriages, stillbirths and deformities in their livestock.

NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES;  Exposure to EMFs can damage DNA in humans and lab animals.  From studies done at the University of Washington, researchers have posited that ELF-EMFs increase free-radical activity in cells, thereby causing DNA damage and disturbing other cellular processes and functions.  Free-radical damage can lead to cellular necrosis and apoptosis (cellular suicide) among the glial cells, myelin and neurons of the brain.  Because the neurons of the brain cannot divide and replace themselves, the harm done by free-radicals due to EMF exposure can lead to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Lou Gehrig’s, conditions which are becoming epidemic in our aging population.  There can be a complicated interaction between intensity, determined by the distance at which an exposed individual is located in relation to the source and duration of exposure in the biological effects of EMFs.  These effects occur in a two-stage molecular process that causes first, the release of iron into the cytoplasm and nucleus then the subsequent generation of hydroxyl radicals that damage DNA, lipids and proteins.  The lipid damage in the cellular membrane leads to calcium leakage from the cell that triggers the second step: an increase in the synthesis of the nitric oxide free radical that can cause more iron-mediated free radicals to be generated as the process feeds back on itself.  When the anti-oxidation processes fail, the cell dies and degeneration of the brain and nervous system occur.

A work group convened by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences reached a consensus, regarding the strength of the scientific evidence of biological health effects due to exposure to 60-Hertz electric and magnetic fields stating that EMFs such as those surrounding electric power lines should be regarded as possible human carcinogens.  The group met June 16-24, 1998 in Brooklyn Park, MN as part of a series of symposia devoted to studying the published literature in the field of EMF research.  The consensus was based on a two-thirds majority and focused on hazard-identification as opposed to risk assessment.

LONG-TERM AND CUMULATIVE EMF EXPOSURES:  The exposure to the electromagnetic fields emanating from high-voltage transmission line such as the 115 kilovolt HVTL proposed by Xcel combined with daily exposure to electromagnetic radiation from microwave ovens, cell phones and towers, computers and other electronics along with the EMFs from electrical appliances will put at risk individuals living near or traveling by the power line on a regular basis of becoming dangerously overexposed to EMFs.  Enough already! especially when there is no need for such an ill-conceived plan.

THE HAZARDS OF PENTACHLOROPHENOL-LADEN UTILITY POLES

If Xcel decides to go cheap and place its proposed HVTL above ground, to transmit the additional electricity into the neighborhoods, it will very likely be using more wooden utility poles preserved with pentachlorophenol pesticide.  There are already half a million of them in the eight-state region, and the utility plans to use more to replace rotted ones.  People in the Seward Neighborhood have complained that the poles in their alleyways have a foul chemical odor.  That isn’t the half of it.  If something can be smelled, that means it is off-gassing and entering the lungs and being absorbed by the system.  Penta is a known toxin harmful to human beings and animals.  

PENTA IS AN UBIQUITOUS AND PERSISTENT TOXIN:  Nearly all non-wood uses of penta were banned in 1984 by the EPA because of its known fetotoxicity and oncogenicity to human health.  Due to pressure from the American Wood Preservers Institute, the EPA did not ban the substance as a wood preservative, and it is still widely used for treating wooden utility poles and railroad ties.  It is also allowed as an anti-fungal agent in oil-well flood waters and pulp and paper-mill solutions.  As a result, it is now ubiquitous and found in the urine samples of children.  It is present in the ditchwater along railroad right of ways.  Penta has been found to be leaching from storage yards where penta-preserved Douglas fir poles are stacked in vast piles by the thousands in British Columbia.  When it rains, we can be sure that the pesticide is being washed off utility poles everywhere in the Metro Area and into our soil as well as surface and groundwaters, contaminating wells and drinking water and imperiling aquatic life.  Penta residues can be found as deep as 168 inches in the ground and the soil around the poles contains 100 milligrams per kilogram of soil or 100 parts per million.  Environment California found three penta-treated poles next to wells, causing drinking water to be contaminated.  These poisonous structures are located near yards, gardens, homes, schools, parks and playgrounds as well as our lakes and streams.

THE HEALTH IMPACTS OF PENTA EXPOSURE:  Penta-treated wood is the largest source of dioxins.  It and its accompanying contaminants are persistent organic pollutants (POPs).  It contains several carcinogens including tri- and tetrachlorophenol and hexachlorobenzene, dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans.  Ranked among some of the most noxious chemicals ever created, penta and its sister chemicals are endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) that mimic estrogen and cause mal-formed reproductive organs in wildlife and humans, hence, the name gender benders.  EDCs make people with such abnormalities prone to reproductive cancers later in life.  Elevated levels of endocrine disruptors are found in the blood of women who have experienced spontaneous abortions, infertility and menstrual disorders.  They also cause immune system dysfunction.  Evidence of endocrine disruption is rarely as strong as it is for penta.  Xcel and the chemical industry naturally deny its serious health impacts and have been lying to people, claiming that “the dose is the poison”, stating that our exposure is low and therefore, harmless.  With EDCs such as penta it is not the amount one has in one’s system, it is the timing of the exposure since they affect fetal and early childhood development as well as visit their deadly mutagenic effects upon the victim later in life.  The synergistic interactions of the many compounds that now, unfortunately, make up our chemical body burden also have a detrimental effect in what has become a deadly toxic soup.

A PETROLEUM DERIVATIVE:  Penta is also a chlorinated hydrocarbon derived from petroleum.  The deadly toxicity of oil-derived pesticides is just one more reason to leave the oil in the ground where Mother Nature put it.  We need to end our addiction to oil in more ways than one.

AN ISSUE OF ENVIRONMENTAL RACISM AND JUSTICE

The Hiawatha area where Xcel proposes to put its HVTL/Substation project is near the Arsenic Triangle where yards and gardens have been contaminated by arsenic used to produce pesticides at a now long-gone industrial plant.  The Phillips Neighborhood is populated by communities of the oppressed nationalities who are now paying dearly for past corporate environmental sins with the erosion of their health.  Exposure to EMFs and penta-laden utility poles will only exacerbate the physical problems they already face.  Some community activists feel that the solution is to place the transmission lines underground-out of sight, out of mind.  3CTC does not think that residents should have to settle for an underground power line and old, inferior technologies for transmitting electricity when ecological, healthy alternatives are available.  The many peoples who make up this community-Indigenous, Latino, African-American, East African-deserve a just transition to a green, sustainable economy, not further victimization by a dirty polluting one.  The best way to see environmental justice served in this case is to install wind and solar power and provide green jobs paid at union scale with full health and retirement benefits to the residents so that they may improve their circumstances and live in a healthier environment.

Now if you want even more information, I found the best scientific overview with links to studies here. The chart above is from the same source.  

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 0 comments }

Will XCEL let Minnesota Shift from 62% Coal?

by Grace Kelly on July 20, 2009

62% of Minnesota’s energy comes from coal! Minnesota still has 13 coal-fired plants . These plants tend to be older plants grandfathered out of complying with the clean air act. In other words, these plants are dirtier polluters. Our heavy reliance on coal in Minnesota is one of the invisible media stories never told.

(From a powerpoint presentation by Dr. Carol Martinez)

So if mountaintops are being decimated in Appalachia, we are part of that cause.  For without demand, the mountaintops would not be decimated.

Coal has been more economical than other energies because the true cost, including environmental cost is not considered. For a quick review, coal power plants are also the largest polluter of toxic mercury pollution. This is one of the reasons that you can fish anywhere in Minnesota, and it is recommended that pregnant women never eat the fish. Coal plants are a major source of toxic air pollution: 59% of total U.S. sulfur dioxide pollution and 18% of total nitrogen, 50% of particle pollution and 40% of total U.S. carbon dioxide pollution. This contributes to health problems like asthma and to global warming. Coal plants create acidic rain which destroys ecosystems by changing delicate pH balances, as well as directly contributing water toxins. And “clean coal” is technically impossible, which means that when politicians use the term “clean coal”, they mean less polluting coal, which is still really awful.

So the real questions are: Will Minnesota be able to move away from coal? Is XCEL, the Minnesota energy company, pushing for coal or green technologies?
We have the technology today to implement real green energy solutions that can curb global warming and cut air pollution, while at the same time building a clean, sustainable economy that lowers energy bills and creates thousands of new jobs.

XCEL is justifying very expensive transmission lines because the highest expect peak loads on really hot days. XCEL could be promoting air conditioning that uses stored excess energy during low use times, that would shift the load of air conditioning off of peak times on hot days. Instead, XCEL is trying to build a massive transmission line that could connect to proposed coal plants outside of Minnesota instead of using conservation, smart grids, local distribution and load shifting technology. By breaking a big transmission project into smaller projects, XCEL could be avoiding a needs and goals discussion.

Historically, XCEL was a strong supporter of coal. It always struck me as bizarre that XCEL was able to charge us as monopoly for lobbying against our own best interests.

The current official policy is that XCEL promotes clean technology. Whether that clean technology includes the impossible “clean coal” is not obvious. Hmmm, maybe we should be quoting this document in fight against the XCEL Hiawatha project?

2008 Corporate Responsibility Report

The energy business provides products that are essential to people’s lives.
We take that responsibility seriously, and delivering safe, reliable, affordable energy is our commitment. Now, we are taking that responsibility to a new level. In addition to our traditional role as an energy provider, Xcel Energy is committed to transforming our business through environmental leadership.

Our vision, in fact, is to help lead the utility industry to a clean energy future. Our customers expect nothing less, and our policymakers are equally interested in making energy clean and making it work for America.

These are tough economic times. But that hasn’t altered our commitment. We’ve always understood that clean energy has to be reliable and affordable for customers and must offer additional value for all of our stakeholders. Our environmental leadership strategy allows us to achieve those goals.

As part of that strategy, we are focused on areas that leverage our commitment to its greatest advantage:  Advanced technology,  Energy efficiency, and Business innovation.

We are investing in advanced wind and solar technology. We are exploring smart grid strategies that will increase communication with customers and enable us to better manage our own systems. Although we’ve had an aggressive conservation effort for more than two decades, we are pursuing new ways to work with customers to conserve energy and manage its use. And we’ve adopted state – of-the-art technologies in our own operations that enable us to reduce our emissions and improve our environmental performance.

As a result of our environmental leadership, Xcel Energy is the No. 1 provider of wind energy in the nation and No. 5 for solar capacity. For the third year in a row, we’ve been named to the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI). Companies listed on the DJSI are considered to be best in class in  economic, environmental and social performance. For the first time, we were listed on a leadership index for the Carbon Disclosure Project, which recognizes the quality of our disclosure.

(xcel)

OK, in XCEL’s defense, I have three sources that say that XCEL fought against the Excelsior Energy coal gasification project. Although, this project was so environmentally wrong and also so very expensive, that fighting this project might not be strong indicator about how the XCEL feels in general about using coal. XCEL still could be pretending that “clean coal” exists.

The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission on Thursday rejected a measure that would have forced Xcel Energy Inc. to buy power from a coal-fired power plant proposed for the Iron Range.

The St. Paul Pioneer Press reports that Excelsior Energy of Wayzata had wanted a mandate that Xcel buy all the output from a $2.1 billion 600-megawatt plant that Excelsior wants to build near Taconite.

(Biz Journal)

And XCEL was still pursuing Big Stone II, a massive coal burning plant located on the border of Minnesota and South Dakota, where the constant winds from the east would dropped most of the air pollution on Minnesota.

On January 15, the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission unanimously approved transmission powerlines linked to Big Stone II, which was believed to have cleared the way for construction of the plant to start.
(Reuters)

OK, in the long anticipated impact of electing President Obama, suddenly the clean air laws are now applied again and the air pollution permit for Big Stone II is pulled. Hopefully this project will no longer be pushed by anyone.

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) – Environmentalists claimed on Friday that a new era regarding coal-fired power plants had arrived with the Obama administration after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency turned back South Dakota’s approval of a big coal-fired power plant in that state because of pollution concerns.

“EPA is signaling that it is back to enforcing long-standing legal requirements fairly and consistently nationwide,” said Bruce Nilles, head of the Sierra Club’s effort to stop coal power plants ….

The proposed $1.3 billion Big Stone II plant near Milbank, is in northeastern South Dakota, near the border with Minnesota. About half of the power from Big Stone II would be sent to Minnesota.

Daly, of the EPA’s Denver office, said the South Dakota Department of Environment & Natural Resources has 90 days to correct three deficiencies it noted in the January 22 …
Obama has said he supports advanced technology for coal-burning power plants that could capture the CO2 emissions. That technology is not yet commercially viable. Coal plants generate half of U.S. electricity supply.

(Reuters)

And so the question before all of us, is can XCEL truly embrace green technology and stop embracing coal?

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 4 comments }

No Need For XCEL Hiawatha Project

by Grace Kelly on July 16, 2009

XCEL is planning an expensive Hiawatha project that would devastate the community when basically need has not been shown. This particular article focuses on the need aspect. Later articles will cover community impact.

The basis of the need requirement is the highest use of electricity, the peak demand.

First of all, this assumption of a continuously increasing demand when people are trying to go off the grid and reduce the carbon footprint is questionable. The continuing downward blue line might be more accurate. However with good conservation efforts, we can make that happen!

 
Appendix D of the XCEL Hiawatha Project is the only superficial need assessment done. Basically, for conservation, the XCEL study only looked at current existing XCEL conservation programs which are admittedly pathetic.

At 2006 peak feeder circuit loading levels in the Focused Study Area, there was a total of 331 MW of customer demand and a deficit of 55 MW under single contingency operating conditions. To eliminate the 55 MW deficit, conservation and DSM programs would need to eliminate approximately 17% of existing load on the distribution system in the Focused Study Area, which is a substantial amount of load reduction and unlikely to be achievable through these programs.

(XCEL)

So let’s assume that XCEL has covered insulation, weather stripping, double windows, good sealing doors and energy star appliances.

Now, let’s just start stacking up the peak conservation methods that we could be using!

1) Offload energy usage from peak times to night times through thermal energy storage (TES).

Air conditioning and process cooling loads are key contributors to this peak electrical demand problem. Approximately 35% to 40% of the peak electrical demand for large commercial office and institutional buildings is air conditioning related.

Thermal Energy Storage (TES) can eliminate approximately 60% to 80% of the peak electrical demand related to air conditioning for many large
commercial office and institutional buildings by transferring most of that air conditioning energy use to the previous night. TES is a proven technology that began over 80 years ago, when electricity prices were high, and electrical systems were unreliable.

Description

TES acts as a storage battery for air conditioning systems – the cooling is done at night, when electrical demand is low and generation or transmission and delivery capacity constraints are minimized. This cooling energy is
stored in a tank for use the next afternoon. During the afternoon, the main air conditioning equipment is shut off. The cooling is then supplied to the building by the “battery”, thus reducing the power usage during peak hours
(when electrical demand is at its highest and power generation equipment efficiency is at its worst).

One key difference between this “air-conditioning battery” and a typical battery is that the air-conditioning battery is over 130% efficient – it takes far less source and site energy to charge the air conditioning battery at night
when it is cool than it would take to run the air-conditioning system on hot afternoons, when power plant and air-conditioning equipment are at their poorest efficiency levels.

(ROI Engineering)

2) Higher peak energy pricing of course encourages people to use electricity at off hours.

3) Plant trees strategically on the south sides of houses to shade roofs!

Urban shade trees offer significant benefits in reducing building air-conditioning demand and improving urban air quality by reducing smog. The savings associated with these benefits vary by climate region and can be up to $200 per tree.

(Science Direct)

4) Use white roofs!

A study released September 9, 2008 by scientists from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California quantified what traditional builders have known for centuries: that white roofs help deflect the sun’s hot rays and reduce the indoor temperature of the building below. In air-conditioned houses, a reflective white roof helps reduce the amount of heat that reaches the inside of the house, reducing the need for air conditioning. In houses without air conditioning, a white roof keeps the house more comfortable on hot days.

(Saving Energy)

5) Use air-conditioning savings time instead of daylight savings time.

By shifting two hours, people will actually come home when the temperature is cooling off saving energy.

Residential load, however, typically reaches its peak later in the day and usually occurs between 4 and 6 p.m. as people return home from work and school for the day.

(XCEL)

In principle, the smart grid is a simple upgrade of 20th century power grids which generally “broadcast” power from a few central power generators to a large number of users, to instead be capable of routing power in more optimal ways to respond to a very wide range of condition

(wiki)

6) Get smart power strips to actually turn off appliances that still use electricity when powered off.

They are half of our appliances, electronic equipment and associated chargers that suck down power even when they’re turned off, in sleep or standby mode. A typical house hosts around 50 such insomniacs, and though individual devices use minuscule amounts of electricity, in the aggregate they’re an astonishing and pricey burden.

This “vampire energy loss” represents between 5 and 8 percent of a single family home’s total electricity use per year, according to the Department of Energy.

(Salon)

So even before using alternative energy, XCEL has not really considered a conservation option at all.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 4 comments }

XCEL High Transmission Lines

by Grace Kelly on July 16, 2009

Minnesota gets most of its energy from coal, and even now our energy company, XCEL, is trying to build MORE high transmission lines to connect up to coal fired plants in other states. XCEL is trying to do end runs around a “Certificate of Need” because basically there is no need. Here is where a high transmission line is proposed:

Tonight there is NO PUBLIC INPUT meeting that I will cover to bring you more of what is happening. We will need everyone’s help and attention to stop this.

So, the meeting is TONIGHT!

Hiawatha Transmission Line Advisory Task Force Mtg #2 of 3

Charged with Drafting the Scope of the EIS

Wednesday, July 15, 2009, 6:00pm – 9:30pm

Midtown Global Market
920 E. Lake St. (at Chicago Ave), Minneapolis

(fyi, take the elevator down to the lower level, walk the only way you can to the propped-open door, and follow the long colorful (orange) hallway all the way to the backfor the meeting – there should be at least a few signs up.)

Note: Public Commenting is not allowed (SAD!), but we can be there to listen to what our “representatives” are saying on our behalf, and learn what’s going on so we can be more effective in our strategies.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 4 comments }

Democratic Party Chair Howard Dean will be kicking off the DFL convention this weekend with a speech on Friday afternoon — his take on the goings-on at the presidential level might be quite interesting.  It’s been noted that a Minnesotan might be in line to succeed him at the head of the DNC, but where would Dean go from there?

I’m going to be unplugging for at least a few hours this evening to relax with my wife (an activity that’s been in dangerously short supply of late), but feel free to leave videos, photos, comments, or stories from your spot at the Obama rally last night (any of the 17,000 of you who were inside or the 15,000+ stuck outside) in the comments.

Now that we have a presumptive nominee, what’s the next step if you were in charge?

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 2 comments }

Notes to self: Never wear salmon on film.  White or blue.  No salmon.  

Otherwise, I thought these interviews went really well.  Coleman gave a thoughtful response to the question on why he was prepared to switch his support from Hillary Clinton to Barack Obama, and did an artfully demure pivot away from a question about the 2010 gubernatorial race.

Madia was solid as ever in front of the camera, taking his opponent Erik Paulsen to task for not addressing the issue of the continuing occupation of Iraq.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 0 comments }

Photos from Obama’s victory rally

by Joe Bodell on June 4, 2008

Barack Obama tonight planted a flag bearing a stylized O on the site of the upcoming Republican National Convention — and his speech was a doozie.  It’s late right now, so I’ll have a full post in the morning, but here’s a small selection of the photos I took:

No, that’s not Barack Obama — it’s Minnesota’s U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar, who was at this very moment in the middle of an interview with Chris Matthews on MSNBC when the crowd decided to interrupt her with raucous applause.  Repeatedly.


Senator Barack Obama speaks to a tremendous crowd.  Word is that at least 15,000 people were stuck outside, unable to squeeze into the Xcel Energy Center.


You know that feeling when you’re in a really, really, REALLY loud place, and your ears just start to warp as though there’s a solid wall of sound assaulting your eardrums?  Yeah. It was that loud at times tonight.


Ladies and gentlemen, the next President and First Lady of the United States.

That’s all for tonight — check back in the morning.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 2 comments }

Casselman serves up the CW kool-aid

by Joe Bodell on June 3, 2008

On the eve of Barack Obama’s victory appearance tonight in St. Paul, alleged expert Barry Casselman put up a piece at Real Clear Politics on this year’s races in our state.

This piece is filled with some rather egregious conventional-wisdom stinkers, unbecoming of discerning voters who deserve better than stock soundbites and shallow analysis. Consider:

Minnesota has become a politically centrist state. A Democrat (called the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, or DFL) has not won the governorship since 1990, and that governor was a pro-life conservative DFLer. The last liberal DFLer to win the governorship was elected in 1974. Since 1978, Republicans have won 7 of the last 11 U.S. Senate races here, and picked up two U.S. House seats. On the other hand, DFLers won back a GOP House seat in 2006, and won big margins of control of both houses of the state legislature that year.

Yes, Minnesota Republicans experienced a high-water mark in 2002 as their colleagues did across the nation. But this “analysis” discounts the massive gains the DFL has made since then, now giving them a near-veto-proof majority in both houses. It also discounts the fact that a rather liberal Republican (Arne Carlson) served as Governor during that period.

As for the candidates the DFL did put up…Rudy Perpich, John Marty, Skip Humphrey, Roger Moe, Mike Hatch. Alternately, that list can be read as: Nice Guy, Sacrificial Lamb to Face Arne Carlson, bad candidate, bad candidate, Mike *($#*$#ing Hatch.  Can’t deny that the DFL’s track record in picking candidates is all that great, but that alone does not make Minnesota a “centrist” state. I seem to remember that it hasn’t voted for a Republican presidential candidate in some time.

There’s more after the break.
Casselman on the Senate race:

Franken and his supporters point out that this is satire, and intended as jokes, but his critics contend that his language is offensive, his humor is tasteless and mocking to women, gays and lesbians. Franken says that he will not respond to this criticism, but since almost all of his professional life has been in comedy and satire, it is inevitable that his work is fair game, just as he claims fair game are the political statements and record of his opponent Norm Coleman.

Difference being, of course, that Coleman’s votes in the Senate affect people’s lives in drastic ways, especially those of Iraqi citizens, and last I checked Franken’s Playboy articles didn’t authorize funding to level any towns in the Fertile Crescent.

But the piece de la crap is still coming toward the end of the article.  Wait for it…

The most competitive House race in Minnesota is MN-3 where popular incumbent GOP Congressman Jim Ramstad is retiring. The demographics of this suburban Minneapolis area now make it a “swing” district favoring a centrist candidate. Former GOP state house majority leader Eric Paulsen has Ramstad’s enthusiastic support and is successfully fundraising so far. His opponent will be Ashwin Madia, 30, an Iraq veteran and attorney making his first run for public office. Madia, son of parents from India, upset moderate state senator Terri Bonoff for the DFL endorsement with an energetic campaign. Now conservative Paulsen and liberal Madia each move to the center where most of the votes in this district are. It could be one of the most competitive House races in the nation in 2008.

Oh I get it, it’s the “pander to your base then dash for the middle, that’s how campaigns work” pattern, right? Come on. The DFL started this race with three moderate candidates.  One dropped out, the other lost at convention. The survivor doesn’t have to go anywhere, because whether Mr. Casselman has actually examined Madia’s positions or not, Madia is already a thoughtful, moderate candidate.  Mr. Casselman’s analysis totally leaves out any inkling of whether the electorate’s positions on important issues have moved — I would contend that especially in CD3, they have done so.  Drastically, and in Madia’s favor.

When one is writing for national observers, there are two generally accepted courses:  skim the surface and leave out important details (or get El Tinklenberg’s name wrong), or get down and dirty with the wonkishness and lose your readers in local details. Casselman has clearly chosen the former here. But there’s a third way — do your homework, build some real insight, and write it in an interesting way that’s digestible by novices on the local scene.

Is that so much to ask?

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

{ 2 comments }